Education in Poor America
The college graduate being turned down for a job at Starbucks for “inadequate education” has become a common joke in America in recent years. Whether it actually happens doesn’t matter because it illustrates how much education someone needs for even a simple job, thinking of starting a career without a four year degree is ludicrous.
Even trying to get a summer job in high school will see college graduates getting picked first because they are more qualified. But in David K. Shiplers The Working Poor: Invisible In America he uses many different sympathetic characters, from all walks of life, to show his readers how important education is in the working world
"Soft Skills"
A college degree or high school diploma are considered necessary for getting even entry level jobs, but in The Working Poor the importance of early education and even learning from role models. This is where people learn “soft skills” that are necessary in the workplace, basic things that are so ingrained people can’t believe that others don’t know to do them, like waking up on time for work or school, or keeping up basic personal hygiene.
But in chapter five he talks to the manager of an on-the-job training center who states that some people don’t know this, because they grew up in situations where they didn’t need to, he says “I was really hard to convince. Surely not. People know to get up. They know to comb their hair. They know to wash their bodies. I’m not being nitpicky here…” (Shipler 127) He couldn’t believe that people don’t know that waking up on time and basic grooming are important when working.
This is a sympathetic character, because readers will share his disbelief, especially students in a college class, they know these things because they’ve been doing it since they were 5 years old in Kindergarten. The idea of someone not knowing to get up on time or stay clean is so foreign to most people that this chapter, and its direct quotes from managers and on-the-job trainers can be eye opening.
"Hard Skills"
It makes the unnamed cashier into a sympathetic character that can share experiences with, and it shows how that can effect someone in the workplace when the author later states “customers may love him, but he won’t be a manager. (Shipler 139). This is someone whos good, even great at his job, but he won’t advance because he can’t do math at an elementary level. It’s not explored in the book but why can’t he make change? Maybe he grew up in situation where he couldn’t go to school, maybe his school was so underfunded that he wasn’t able to learn, maybe he just has problems with math as many people do, maybe it was all three.
Conclusion
David K. Shipler uses many different sympathetic characters to show the importance of education in the working world. His book is filled with characters, from all walks of life, in all different situations, all of which the audience can relate to in one way or another. Each one of these characters tells a different story about working poor in America, and together they make a whole story of Americans that isn’t told anywhere else.
Works Cited
Shipler, D. K. (2004). The Working Poor: Invisible
in America. New York: Vintage.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey I think that there isn't enough summary of what you're talking about in the introduction and while your message is clear, what isn't clear is how that ties into some sort of theme about the American dream.
ReplyDeleteI like how you have a colorful background which goes well with the green font that you have used. Although, I think the section title should be in the middle instead of on the left hand side. Within your work cited you need another source for your paper. The quotes that you had used provide great evidence.
ReplyDelete